Berwind Fuel Co. v. Bailey

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided May 2, 1923.

Rehearing Denied June 8, 1923.)

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1923-05-02

Cited by 1 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 1924

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1923-05-02

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Action at law by Edward Bailey against the Berwind Fuel Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error. Affirmed.

¶2Clarence Hartley, of Superior, Wis., for plaintiff in error. W. P. Crawford, of Superior, Wis., and R. S. Marriner, of Washington, Pa., for defendant in error.

¶3Before BAKER, ALSCHULER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5Reversal of the judgment is sought on the sole ground that there was not sufficient evidence in favor of the position of the defendant in error to warrant the trial court in submitting the issue to the jury. We agree with the trial judge that there was. The judgment is affirmed.