Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.1d 148 - Lewis v. Council

Lewis v. Council’s Empirical Analysis

291 F. 148 · 1923

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
March 1934
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Briggs v. Spaulding · Porter v. Sabin · Sawyer v. Hoag · Solomon v. . Bates · Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co. v. Floyd

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Notwithstanding the reiteration, with accumulating intensity, of language found in the bill, I am not able to find any evidence of either positive misfeasance, misappropriation, or other dishonest or fraudulent conduct by the defendant; nor do I find any evidence of knowledge of such conduct by the secretary and manager, or such information in respect to such conduct, as fixes him with liability as a particeps criminis, upon the principles announced in Chemical Co. v. Floyd [ 158 N. C. 455 , 74 S. E. 465 ]; Chemical Co. v. Ehrich, supra [(D. C.) 230 F. 1005 ]; and other decided eases. * * * ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.