Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.2d 478 - United States v. Thomas

United States v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis

291 F.2d 478 · 1961

Citation profile

35
cited by 35 later decisions
May 1990
most recently cited

30 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 35 later decisions — most recently May 1990 · most notably United States v. Walker (1962), Nelms v. United States (1963)

30 federal appellate ·

2901961197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rodriguez v. New York · Pauling v. McElroy · United States v. Ohio Power Co. · Phillips Chemical Co. v. Dumas Independent School District · V. P. Serodino, Inc. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 35 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whenever after arrest and prior to the imposition of sentence * * * the United States Attorney has reasonable cause to believe that a person charged with an offense against the United States may be presently insane or otherwise so mentally incompetent as to be unable to understand the proceedings against him or properly to assist in his own defense, he shall file a motion for a judicial determination of such mental competency of the accused, setting forth the grounds for belief with the trial court in which proceedings are pending. Upon such a motion or upon a similar motion in behalf of the accused, or upon its own motion, the court shall cause the accused, whether or not previously admitted to bail, to be examined as to his mental condition by at least one qualified psychiatrist, who shall report to the court. * * *””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “* * * there is probable cause to believe that such person was incompetent at the time of his trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “* * * has been examined by the board of examiners * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.