Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.2d 496 - Local 33, International Hod Carriers Building And Common Laborers' Union Of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mason Tenders District Council Of Greater New York

Local 33, International Hod Carriers Building And Common Laborers' Union Of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mason Tenders District Council Of Greater New York’s Empirical Analysis

291 F.2d 496 · 1961

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
8
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

52 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Coach Leatherware Co. v. Anntaylor, Inc. (1991), Cool Fuel, Inc. v. Connett (1982)

52 federal appellate · 12 district · 12 state decisions

7001961197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Bell v. Hood · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · Beacon Theaters Inc v. C Westover · Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “it is most desirable that the court cut through mere outworn procedural niceties and make the same decision as would have been made had defendant made a cross-motion for summary judgment.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““It is obvious from reading these sections that this statutory scheme does not purport to give the Board general supervisory powers over controversies between labor organizations relating to work assignments. The Board may act only when a charge has been filed and a mere disagreement over work assignments is not enough to create an unfair labor practice. * * * We think to hold that the District Court has no jurisdiction would run counter to the position which Congress has accorded to voluntary adjustments.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “(a) It shall be unlawful, for the purpose of this section only, in an industry or activity affecting commerce, for any labor organization to engage in any activity or conduct defined as an unfair labor prac tice in section 158(b) (4) of this title. (b) Whoever shall be injured in his business or property by reason or [sic] any violation of subsection (a) of this section may sue therefor in any district court of the United States subject to the limitations and provisions of section 185 of this title without respect to the amount in controversy, or in any other court having jurisdiction of the parties, and shall recover the damages by him sustained and the cost of the suit.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.