Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

291 F.2d 627

Docket No. 14432.

Williams v. Bell

Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1961-06-14

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 1986

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Sweeney v. Woodall · Johnson v. Matthews

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1961-06-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Max Dean, Flint, Mich., Leitson, Dean, Dean & Abram, Flint, Mich., on brief, for petitioner-appellant.

Robert F. Leonard, Asst. Pros. Atty., Flint, Mich., for respondent-appellee.

Before MILLER, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges.

ORDER.

¶1

The above cause coming on to be heard on the transcript of record, the briefs of the parties, and the argument of counsel in open court, and the court being duly advised,

¶2

Now therefore it is ordered, adjudged and decreed that the order of the District Court denying appellant's petition for habeas corpus, be and is hereby affirmed on the authority of Sweeney v. Woodall, 344 U.S. 86, 73 S.Ct. 139, 97 L.Ed. 114, and Johnson v. Matthews, 86 U.S.App. D.C. 376, 182 F.2d 677.

/291/f2d/627 · .json · Public domain