Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.3d 36 - Lederman v. United States

Lederman v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

291 F.3d 36 · 2002

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
1
states following
April 2024
most recently cited

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably Roska v. Peterson (2003), American Civil Liberties Union v. City of Las Vegas (2003)

23 federal appellate · 14 district · 2 state decisions

350200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2674 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Perry Education Ass'n v. Perry Local Educators' Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If people entering and leaving the Capitol can avoid running headlong into tourists, joggers, dogs, and strollers ... then we assume they are also capable of circumnavigating the occasional protester.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`foreclose[d] speculation by enforcement officers concerning its constitutionality,'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “a single leafleteer standing on the East Front sidewalk,” were”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.