Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.3d 380 - Jamison v. Collins

Jamison v. Collins’s Empirical Analysis

291 F.3d 380 · 2002

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
October 2024
most recently cited

21 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently October 2024 · most notably Satterlee v. Wolfenbarger (2006), Fautenberry v. Mitchell (2008)

21 federal appellate ·

290200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · Wainwright v. Sykes · Murray v. Carrier · Kyles v. Whitley · United States v. Frady

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “First, the court must ascertain whether there is an applicable state procedural rule. Second, the court must determine whether the state courts actually enforce the rule. Third, the court must decide whether the state procedural forfeiture is an adequate and independent state ground on which the state can rely to foreclose review of a federal constitutional claim. Finally ..., if the criminal defendant did not comply with the rule, the defendant must demonstrate there was cause for him not to follow the procedural rule, and that he was actually prejudiced by the alleged constitutional error.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[t]he question is not whether the defendant would more likely than not have received a different verdict with the evidence, but whether in its absence he received a fair trial, understood as a trial resulting in a verdict worthy of confidence.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “reasonable probability of a different outcome of the trial had the Brady material been available.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.