Roche v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis
291 F.3d 473 · 2002
Citation profile
13 federal appellate · 5 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Williams v. Taylor · Lindh v. Murphy · Illinois v. Allen · Ylst v. Nunnemaker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a reasonable probability that, but for counsel's unprofessional errors, the result of the proceeding would have been different.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 , 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed.2d 674 (1984) or an”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Myartt v. Frank“the extreme inherent prejudice associated with shackling,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.