Dixon v. Page’s Empirical Analysis
291 F.3d 485 · 2002
Citation profile
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 91 later decisions — most recently August 2021 · most notably Strong v. David (2002), Kaba v. Ea Stepp E (2006)
33 federal appellate · 2 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 42 U.S.C. § 1997E
Relies on V. C O Churner · Correction Officer Porters v. Ronald Nussle · Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works · Perez v. Wisconsin Department of Corrections · Pozo v. McCaughtry
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 91 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[n]o action shall be brought with respect to prison conditions ... by a prisoner confined in any jail, prison, or other correctional facility until such administrative remedies as are available are exhausted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Berry v. Kerik“administrative remedies are not really available,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Brown v. Valoff
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.