Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 F.3d 917 - Rose v. Stephens

Rose v. Stephens’s Empirical Analysis

291 F.3d 917 · 2002

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
1
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently February 2021 · most notably Silberstein v. City of Dayton (2006), Scarbrough v. Morgan County Board of Education (2006)

16 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions

240200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Elrod v. Burns · Branti v. Finkel · Rankin v. McPherson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) positions specifically named in relevant law to which discretionary authority in carrying out law enforcement or political policy is granted; (2) positions to which a significant amount of category-one authority has been delegated, or positions not specifically named by law but inherently possessing category-one type authority; (3) confidential advisors to category-one position-holders; or (4) positions that are part of a group of positions filled by balancing out political party representation or by balancing out selections made by different government bodies.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[A]s the Supreme Court has recognized, `employees may always be discharged for good cause, such as insubordination. . . .'”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “where a confidential or policymaking public employee is discharged on the basis of speech related to his political or policy views, the Pickering balance favors the government as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.