Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 FSUPP 615 - In re Lollis

In re Lollis’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
April 1983
most recently cited

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Beck v. State of Ohio · Draper v. United States · Johnson v. State of New Jersey · Reynolds v. Sims

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “* * * Habeas corpus is not the proper place to raise objection to [the] selection of [an] individual juror[]. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.