Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 GA 863 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Barker v. Wingo · Doggett v. United States · Vermont v. Brillon · In re Draffin · Ruffin v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[I]t is not the job of [an] appellate court ... to weigh the Barker factors in the first instance,” [State v.] Pickett, 288 Ga. 674, 679-680 (2) (d) ( 706 SE2d 561 ) (2011), and so, when a trial court has abused its discretion in its consideration of these factors, we generally remand the case for the trial court to exercise its discretion again. [Cits.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to correctly apply the pertinent legal principles and to consider again whether [Durham] was denied his right to a speedy trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “reasonable minds could not disagree about whether the right to a speedy trial has been denied,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.