Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 ILL 334 - Murrell v. Industrial Commission

Murrell v. Industrial Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1920

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
8
states following
July 1993
most recently cited

32 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 1993 · most notably 145 Ill. 2d 166 - Harris Trust & Savings Bank v. Donovan (1991), Faber v. Industrial Commission (1933)

32 state decisions

10019201930194019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McDonald v. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis R'y Co. · Marshall v. Wabash Railroad · Blacklaws v. Milne · Johnstone v. Taliaferro

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The workmen’s compensation act mentions only children by which is ordinarily meant legitimate children, and there is no word in the act which indicates that the legislature used the word in any other than its ordinary sense. Indeed, in paragraph (5) the words ‘or other lineal heir,’ used in connection with the words ‘any widow, child, parent, grandparent/ seem to imply that the child, parent, grandparent mentioned must be a lineal heir, — that is, that the relation must be legitimate.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The words of a statute will be construed in their ordinary sense and with the meaning commonly attributed to them under such construction unless such construction will defeat the manifest intention of the legislature. When the words have a well-settled meaning through judicial interpretation, they must be understood, when used in a statute, to have that meaning unless a different meaning is unmistakably indicated.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “... widow, child, parent, grandparent or other lineal heir ...”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.