State v. Daniel’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

86 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “the same protection from unlawful government searches and seizures as the Fourth Amendment.”

   3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. City of Leawood v. Puccinelli · State v. Ellis

2. “Kansas counts among the majority of states which have construed state constitutional provisions in a manner consistent with the United States Supreme Court's interpretation of the Fourth Amendment.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
   e.g. State v. Daino

3. “Th[e] exclusionary rule operates to protect Fourth Amendment rights through deterrence, and it is not the defendant's personal constitutional right.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Thornton