Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 Kan. 89 - State v. Leaper

State v. Leaper’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
2
states following
October 2020
most recently cited

19 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Smith v. Phillips · Morgan v. Illinois · Spencer v. Commonwealth · State v. Dixon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The trial court may terminate the trial and order a mistrial at any time that he finds termination is necessary because: "(a) It is physically impossible to proceed with trial in conformity with law; or "(b) There is a legal defect in the proceedings which would make any judgment entered upon a verdict reversible as a matter of law and the defendant requests or consents to the declaration of a mistrial; or "(c) Prejudicial conduct, in or outside the courtroom, makes it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice to either the defendant or the prosecution.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The trial court may terminate the trial and order a mistrial at any time that he finds termination is necessary because:”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “makes it impossible to proceed with the trial without injustice,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.