291 Md. 276
434 A.2d 581
Decided September 15, 1981
Court of Appeals of Maryland · decided 1981-09-15
<p>The cause was submitted to Murphy, C. J., and Smith, Digges, Eldridge, Cole, Davidson and Rodowsky, JJ.</p>
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently April 1999
8 state decisions
Key passage — most relied on by later courts
“Certiorari was granted ... to consider whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in upholding the denial of petitioner’s motion to dismiss under Maryland] Rule 746. For the reasons stated in [our Donalds’ opinion], the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is affirmed.”
quoted by 1 later decision, including Icgoren v. State
Relies on 49 Md. App. 106 - Donalds v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1981-09-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1 Certiorari was granted in this case to consider whether the Court of Special Appeals erred in upholding the denial of petitioner’s motion to dismiss under Mary Rule 746. For the reasons stated in Donalds v. State, 49 Md. App. 106, 430 A.2d 113 (1981), the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals is affirmed.
¶2 Judgment of the Court of Special Appeals affirmed; costs to be paid by the appellant.