Hill v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
22 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 24 later decisions — most recently February 2019
22 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 3911
Relies on McCarty v. McCarty · Kissinger v. Halperin · Seafarers International Union v. Stone · In Re the Marriage of Miller · Cose v. Cose
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 24 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“under the Supremacy clause, upon the dissolution of a marriage, ( the federal military retirement statute] precludes a Maryland court from dividing military nondisability retired pay as marital property pursuant to 3-6A-05.” Because of this decision, Hill did not address whether military retired pay constitutes marital property under the Maryland statute. Id. n.6. 3 . At this point, it is appropriate that we define some of the terms we use in this opinion. In the context of disputes over marital property arising in an action for divorce, a pension is generally regarded as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Deering v. Deering
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.