Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 N.C. 693 - In Re Hatley

In Re Hatley’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

90
cited by 90 later decisions
7
states following
August 2019
most recently cited

90 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 90 later decisions — most recently August 2019 · most notably 145 N.C. App. 434 - Smith Ex Rel. Smith v. Smith (2001), 59 Ill. App. 3d 500 - People v. Garcia (1978)

90 state decisions

36019771980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Sibron v. State of New York Peters · O'Connor v. Donaldson · 18 Ill. App. 3d 315 - People v. Sansone · In Re John Ballay, A/K/A Figeret Hoxha, Patient · 21 Ill. App. 3d 889 - People v. Sciara

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 90 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “possibility that [R]espondent's commitment in this case might ... form the basis for a future commitment, along with other obvious collateral legal consequences[.]”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “even when the terms of the judgment below have been fully carried out, if collateral legal consequences of an adverse nature can reasonably be expected to result therefrom, then the issue is not moot and the appeal has continued legal significance.”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “by clear, cogent, and convincing evidence that the respondent is mentally ill and dangerous to self ... or dangerous to others....”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.