Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 NW2D 345 - State v. Graham

State v. Graham’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Rakas v. Illinois · Alderman v. United States · United States v. Nobles · Bullock v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “If it appears from the bill of particulars furnished pursuant to this rule that the particulars stated do not constitute the offense charged in the indictment or information, or that the defendant did not commit that offense or that a prosecution for that offense is barred by the statute of limitations, the court may and on motion of defendant shall dismiss the indictment or information unless the prosecuting attorney shall furnish another bill of particulars which so states the particulars as to cure the defect.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “(1)When the minutes of evidence have not been filed with the information. (2) When the information has not been filed in the manner required by law. (3) When the information has not been approved as required under R.Cr.P. 5(4).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.