Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

291 N.Y. 756

52 N.E.2d 964

Langrick v. Rowe

New York Court of Appeals

Decided December 8, 1943

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1943-12-08

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1943-12-08

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1994

4 state decisions

30194319501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Order affirmed, without costs, upon the ground that when the appellant applied at Special Term for an order authorizing her to withdraw the fund deposited with the City Treasurer pursuant to the terms of the partition judgment in the above captioned action, she failed to give notice of such application, as required by rule 32 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to the attorneys for all parties who had appeared therein or filed notice of claim to such fund. We do not pass upon the merits of the controversy. No opinion.

¶2 Concur: Lehman, Ch. J., Loughban, Rippey, Lewis, Conway, Desmond and Thacheb, JJ.

/291/ny/756 · .json · Public domain