Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 Or. App. 124 - State v. Roberts

291 Or. App. 124 - State v. Roberts’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

16 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Gerrow v. United States · United States v. Ogbuehi · State v. Davis · Rosalba Aguirre-Cervantes v. Immigration and Naturalization Service · Peeples v. Lampert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An invocation is equivocal * * * when the suspect's statement or request is subject to more than one reasonable interpretation, one of which is that he or she is invoking the right [at issue].”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “never took an explicit position on that issue below,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “The purposes of the preservation requirement are to (1) apprise the trial court of a party's position such that it can consider and rule on it, (2) ensure fairness to the opposing party by avoiding surprise and allowing that party to address all issues raised, and (3) foster full development of the record.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.