291 Or. App. 450 - State v. Krieger’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Davis · State v. Ritz · State v. Affeld · State v. Marrington · Oklahoma Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Tax Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"The offer of proof serves several purposes. It permits the trial court to reconsider its ruling in view of the actual evidence to be offered. State v. Smith , 319 Or. 37 , 44, 872 P.2d 966 (1994). The offer of proof permits the appellate courts to decide whether error occurred. And, ultimately, the offer permits the appellate courts to determine whether an error was likely to have affected the result of the case so as to constitute prejudicial error. Id . ; see State v. Morgan , 251 Or. App. 99 , 105, 284 P.3d 496 (2012) (an offer of proof shows whether an error 'was likely to have affected the result of the case' (internal quotation marks omitted))."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Id . On this record, we cannot determine whether the excluded evidence was prejudicial because defendant failed to make an offer of proof. The limited colloquy recounted above was the full extent of the discussion about the videos. Defendant made no formal or informal offer of proof and did not elaborate to propound the relevance of the video. Defendant merely said that the videos were made by an expert, that he acted in good faith to get the videos to Cedartech's counsel upon receipt, and that the three videos were together about 20 minutes long. Nonetheless, defendant contends that there”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Whether in testimony, in a narrative summary, or, at the least, in descriptive argument, an offer of proof remains essential in order to permit an appellate court to determine whether there is reversible error.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.