Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 Or. App. 496 - State v. Warren

291 Or. App. 496 - State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

2018

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Davis · State v. Baughman · State v. Turnidge · State v. Kruchek · Outdoor Media Dimensions Inc. v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Even assuming that the development of the factual record before the trial court would not have been materially affected if the contention had been raised initially, * * * the fact remains that to address that contention meaningfully would require us, in the first instance-without legal record development or any real assistance from the parties-to decide difficult, nuanced, and systemically significant issues. We respectfully decline to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.