291 Or. App. 762 - State v. Rosales’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

4 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “"[b]ecause the mission of a traffic stop may involve determining whether to issue a ticket, making ordinary inquiries incident to the stop, and taking certain precautions to ensure officer safety, the stop may last long enough to allow an officer to engage in those activities. But those 'highway and officer safety' interests are 'different in kind from the Government's endeavor to detect crime in general or drug trafficking in particular.' Accordingly, an officer may not conduct investigations unrelated to the stop's mission 'in a way that prolongs the stop, absent *** reasonable suspicion.' A dog sniff is aimed at detecting 'ordinary criminal wrongdoing' and is 'not an ordinary incident of a traffic stop.' Thus, if a dog sniff is conducted without reasonable suspicion of criminal activity, the 'critical question' that must be asked in determining whether the sniff violates the Fourth Amendment is whether the sniff 'adds time to' the stop."”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 687 - State v. Kamph

2. “'critical question' that must be asked in determining whether the sniff violates the Fourth Amendment is whether the sniff 'adds time to' the stop.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 687 - State v. Kamph

3. “only a direct and unambiguous accusation of unlawful activity can, by itself, amount to a seizure for purposes of Article I, section 9.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. 297 Or. App. 687 - State v. Kamph