291 Pa. Super. 381 - Ford v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Pa. Super. 85 - Norman S. White v. Beatrice M. White · 103 Pa. Super. 306 - Betz v. Betz · 144 Pa. Super. 513 - Foust v. Foust · Ulizio v. Ulizio · 87 Pa. Super. 1 - Hilyard v. Hilyard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The defendant may set forth in an answer under the heading “Counterclaim” a cause of action for divorce or for annulment and, whether the defendant does so or not, may set forth any other matter which under the Divorce Code may be joined with an action for divorce.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.