Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 SO2D 118 - Wright v. State

Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
July 1988
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Specht v. Patterson · 102 So. 2d 814 - Shargaa v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"That the procedures under said § 775.11 may well be archaic and cumbersome and that the legislature in the upcoming session may well wish to reconsider its failure in 1971 to repeal that section when it sought to streamline the recidivism concept by enacting § 775.084, ..." Id. at 121.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “was intended to be substituted in the stead of the repealed sections and ... was to be the sole general recidivist statute in force.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “insofar as the procedures are concerned for the imposition of enhanced punishment in the normal recidivist situation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.