291 So. 2d 187 - Moore v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently August 1996
9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 267 So. 2d 305 - Feranda v. State · Abele v. State · Hutchins v. State · 248 So. 2d 439 - Everett v. State · Sykes v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Although uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice is looked upon with suspicion in practically all courts, and some courts refuse to convict on uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice, nevertheless, at common law [20 Am.Jur.Evidence § 1235, at 1088 (1939)] and under the decisions of this State [ Feranda, supra ] it is well settled that such testimony, although entirely without corroboration, will support a verdict of conviction.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“We have had an opportunity to study this question heretofore, and we have held that this type of evidence is admissible. (citations to Ladner and Everett ) We think this testimony was admissible in the instant case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lee v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.