Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

291 So. 2d 68

Docket No. 73-313.

Sanders v. Impellitier

William D. SANDERS, Appellant, v. Kenneth C. IMPELLITIER et al., Appellees.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1974-03-08

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently December 1976

1 state decisions

Relies on 89 So. 2d 24 - Kauffman v. King · 241 So. 2d 193 - Simpson v. Broward County · 231 So. 2d 224 - Czuchta v. Williard

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1974-03-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1*69 William D. Sanders and Donald L. Burrie, Pompano Beach, for appellant.

¶2Richard A. Bird of Bird & Carpenter, Fort Lauderdale, for appellees.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The defendant, in a civil action for damages, filed interlocutory appeal seeking review of an order granting the plaintiffs' motion for inspection and discovery and denying the defendant's motion for a protective order. The order is nonappealable and we, therefore, lack jurisdiction. We decline to treat the interlocutory appeal as a petition for common law certiorari as it has not been made to appear that appellant does not have a full, adequate and complete remedy by appeal after final judgment. Kauffman v. King, Fla. 1956, 89 So.2d 24; Simpson v. Broward County, Fla.App. 1970, 241 So.2d 193; Bland v. Mitchell, Fla.App. 1970, 231 So.2d 224.

¶5Interlocutory appeal dismissed.

¶6OWEN, C.J., and CROSS and DOWNEY, JJ., concur.

/291/so2d/68 · .json · Public domain