291 So. 2d 767 - State v. Stephenson’s Empirical Analysis
1974
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently March 2001
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 278 So. 2d 485 - State v. Douglas · Luery v. State · State v. Crockett · Smith v. State · State v. Jugger
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Defendant fails to show that any special class was systematically excluded, or that he was deprived of a trial before an unbiased jury because of the defect alleged. The defendant was not compelled to accept an obnoxious juror as a result of the ruling, (citation omitted). The accused has no right to a trial by any particular jury or juror, but only to a trial by a competent, impartial jury," citing State v. Preece, 270 So.2d 850 (La.1973) and State v. Boutte, 255 La. 605 , 232 So.2d 288 (1970)."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Johnson · State v. Simms“"The accused has no right to a trial by any particular jury or juror, but only to a trial by a competent, impartial jury."”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.