Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 SW3D 269 - State v. Martin

State v. Martin’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · Batson v. Kentucky · Crawford v. Washington

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Confrontation Clause violations are subject to the harmless error test found in Chapman v. California, 386 U.S. 18, 24 , 87 S.Ct. 824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967). That test requires that the error be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt, meaning that there is no reasonable doubt that the error’s admission failed to contribute to the jury’s verdict.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.