Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 Va. 301 - Haynes v. Haggerty

Haynes v. Haggerty’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Perry v. Com. · Starnes v. Cayouette · Klarfeld v. Salsbury · Bissell v. Commonwealth · Van Dam v. Gay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[O]ur appellate review 'is not limited to the evidence mentioned by a party in trial argument or by the trial court in its ruling.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ppellate courts do 'not review lower courts' opinions, but their judgments.' " Evans v. Commonwealth , 290 Va. 277 , 288 n.12, 776 S.E.2d 760 , 766 n. 12 (2015) (quoting Jennings v. Stephens , 574 U.S. ----, 135 S.Ct. 793 , 799, 190 L.Ed.2d 662 (2015) ). "In instances where a trial court's decision is correct, but its reasoning is incorrect, and the record supports the correct reason, we uphold the judgment pursuant to the right result for the wrong reason doctrine.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “This Court may uphold a judgment even when the correct reasoning is not mentioned by a party in trial argument or by the trial court in its decision, as long as the record contains sufficient information to support the proper reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.