Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 291 WIS2D 751 - State v. Klubertanz

State v. Klubertanz’s Empirical Analysis

2006

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 49 Wis. 2d 263 - McCleary v. State · State v. Gallion · 70 Wis. 2d 280 - Rosado v. State · 46 Wis. 2d 93 - Hayes v. States · 60 Wis. 2d 506 - State v. Taylor

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When the circuit court has exercised its discretion, we follow a consistent and strong policy against interference with the discretion of the [sentencing] court, and we afford 'a strong presumption of reasonability1 to the court's sentencing determination because the [sentencing] court is best suited to consider the relevant factors and demeanor of the convicted defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Discretion contemplates a process of reasoning based on the facts of record and reasonable inferences from those facts and a conclusion supported by a logical rationale founded upon proper legal standards.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.