Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 Ark. 564 - Cogburn v. State

Cogburn v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

45
cited by 45 later decisions
9
states following
January 2024
most recently cited

45 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently January 2024 · most notably Misskelley v. State (1996), Lukach v. State (1992)

45 state decisions

25019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ohio v. Roberts · California v. Green · Arizona v. Youngblood · Kring v. State of Missouri · 103 Wash. 2d 165 - State v. Ryan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The United States Supreme Court has held that the confrontation clause is not violated by admitting a declarant’s out-of-court statements, as long as the declarant is testifying as a witness and subject to full and effective cross-examination.... Here, the victim testified at the trial and was subject to unbridled cross-examination. Therefore, the hearsay evidence admitted against [the defendant] concerning the victim’s statements under [the rule] did not violate the confrontation clause[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the state was in effect permitted to offer the direct testimony of the victim twice, once through the videotape and once through live testimony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “because of the error in admitting the videotaped statement of the victim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.