Bruusgaard v. Acosta’s Empirical Analysis
292 F. 957 · 1923
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently October 1973
6 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Texas Co. v. Hogarth Shipping Co. · Jones v. United States · International Paper Co. v. The Schooner "Gracie D. Chambers" · George Crossman v. William Burrill
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is well settled that where a merchant has undertaken to discharge a ship within a fixed number of days he is liable in demur-rage for any delay of the ship beyond that period unless such delay is attributable to the fault of the shipowner or those for whom he is responsible. The risk of delay from causes for which neither of the contracting parties is responsible is with the merchant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.