Niagara Fire Insurance v. Everett’s Empirical Analysis
292 F.2d 100 · 1961
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently August 2015
5 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Columbia Properties, Inc. v. State Board of Tax Commissioners · Sanders v. Leech · United States v. Schultetus · Syndicate Ins. v. Bohn · Knowles v. Dixie Fire Ins. Co. of Greensboro, N.C.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Conditions suspending or restricting insurance”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent“.. . Moral hazard, in insurance, is but another name for a pecuniary increase to the insured should the property burn. Statistics, experience, and observation all teach that the moral hazard is least when the pecuniary interest of the insured in the protection of the property against fire is greatest, and the moral hazard is greatest when the insured may gain most should the property burn. (Citations omitted) .. .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.