No 18716’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 37 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably 21 Md. App. 307 - Bel Pre Medical Center, Inc. v. Frederick Contractors, Inc. (1974), International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio, and Its Local Lodge No. 2003 v. Hayes Corporation (1961)
10 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co. · United Steelworkers of America v. Enterprise Wheel and Car Corp · Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala. · United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co. · Wilko v. Swan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 37 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘Article IV — Grievance Procedure “ ‘Section 1. It is the mutual intent and desire of the Union and the Company that employees make an effort to settle their problems or grievances with their Superior prior to resorting to the Grievance Procedure.’ i'fi ifc & jfc * “ ‘Section 2. Should any difference arise between the Company and any employee as to the meaning, application or interpretation of the provisions of this Agreement, such difference may constitute a grievance and shall be settled as follows: “‘[(a) through (f) described successive steps] * * * “‘(e) If the grievance is not satisfactorily adjusted by the General Manager or his designated representative, then arbitration may be invoked as provided in Article V.’ “Article V prescribed a Board of Arbitration composed of one member selected by the Union and one by the Company. The Union and the Company had to name their representatives within three days. Section 1 then provided: “ ‘Before proceeding toward selection of the third member of the Board of Arbitration, the two representatives appointed by the parties shall attempt to effect a settlement of the controversy within five (5) days * * *. If it should appear that additional time would be helpful toward effecting settlement, this five (5) day period may be extended by mutual consent of the two representatives. In the event settlement of the controversy is not effected during such period * * the two representatives shall * * * select the disinterested member * * Th”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.