Atkinson v. Jory’s Empirical Analysis
292 F.2d 169 · 1961
Citation profile
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently December 2000
12 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stewart v. Ramsay · Lamb v. Schmitt · United States v. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. · Kay Hunt v. Vernon J. Pick, Andrew Hunt v. Vernon J. Pick
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““(W)e are unwilling to sustain a summary judgment where the record is unclear to us on both fact and the legal theory forming the basis of the ruling.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Frey v. Frankel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.