Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 F.2d 244 - Geagan v. Gavin

Geagan v. Gavin’s Empirical Analysis

292 F.2d 244 · 1961

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
June 1984
most recently cited

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently June 1984 · most notably Commonwealth v. Walker (1976), United States v. Guerrero (1984)

19 federal appellate · 4 district · 4 state decisions

200196119701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Brown v. Allen · Reynolds v. States · Bridges v. State of California Times-Mirror Co · Craig v. Harney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The question whether jurors are impartial in the constitutional sense is one of mixed law and fact as to which the challenger has the burden of persuasion, for: ‘Unless he shows the actual existence of such an opinion in the mind of the juror as will raise the presumption of partiality, the juror need not necessarily be set aside. * * * ’ Reynolds v. United States, 1878, 98 U.S. 145 , 157, 25 L.Ed. 244 , quoted with approval in Irvin v. Dowd, [ 366 U.S. 717 , 81 S.Ct. 1639 , 6 L.Ed.2d 751 ], supra. And, to decide whether the challenger has sustained his burden, it is the duty of this court as stated in the case last cited ‘to independently evaluate the voir dire testimony of the impaneled jurors.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.