Bary v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
292 F.2d 53 · 1961
Citation profile
55 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 68 later decisions — most recently March 2006 · most notably United States v. Haldeman (1976), United States v. Kelly (1965)
55 federal appellate · 1 district · 6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2385 · 18 U.S.C. § 3500
Relies on Stirone v. United States · Yates v. United States · Jencks v. United States · Palermo v. United States · Bain Jr
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 68 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the United States elects not to comply with an order of the court to deliver to the defendant any such statement, or such portion thereof as the court may direct, the court shall strike from the record the testimony of the witness, and the trial shall proceed unless the court in its discretion shall determine that the interests of justice require that a mistrial be declared.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“strike surplusage from the indictment or information”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.