Todd v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
292 F.2d 841 · 1961
Citation profile
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 73 later decisions — most recently August 2010 · most notably R. J. Widen Company v. The United States and Commonwealth of Massachusetts, Third-Party (1966), Conti v. United States (2002)
6 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1492 · 28 U.S.C. § 2501 · 33 U.S.C. § 1 · 33 U.S.C. § 3
Relies on United States v. Miller · Simpson v. Shepard · United States v. Grand River Dam Authority · 161 F. Supp. 409 - Empire Institute of Tailoring, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 73 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A taking of property within the meaning of the Constitution may be accomplished without formally divesting the owner of title to the property or of any interest therein. It is not material whether the property is removed from the possession of the owner, or in any respect changes hands * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.