Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 F.3d 1222 - Gaines v. Stenseng

Gaines v. Stenseng’s Empirical Analysis

292 F.3d 1222 · 2002

Citation profile

72
cited by 72 later decisions
1
states following
August 2023
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 72 later decisions — most recently August 2023 · most notably Fogle v. Pierson (2006), Kay v. Bemis (2007)

13 federal appellate · 6 district · 1 state decisions

530200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co. · Graham v. Connor · Sandin v. Conner · Perkins v. Kansas Department of Corrections · Cummings v. Evans

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 72 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Dismissal of a pro se complaint for failure to state a claim is proper only where it is obvious that the plaintiff cannot prevail on the facts he has alleged and it would be futile to give him an opportunity to amend. In determining whether a dismissal is proper, we must accept the allegations of the complaint as true and construe those allegations, and any rea- ■ sonable inferences that might be drawn from them, in the light most favorable to the plaintiff.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.