Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 F.3d 526 - Wild v. Subscription Plus, Inc.

Wild v. Subscription Plus, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

292 F.3d 526 · 2002

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 28 U.S.C. § 1406

Relies on Van Dusen v. Barrack · Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman · Newman-Green, Inc. v. Alfonzo-Larrain · Carden v. Arkoma Associates · Shutte v. Armco Steel Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “An approach consistent with the general principle, but which leads to the same result in this case as the approach in Costain would, makes the question of what state a corporation is a citizen of if its corporate charter has been revoked depend on the status of such an entity under the law of the state that granted (and later revoked) the charter. Most states sensibly permit a corporation whose charter has been revoked to continue nevertheless to operate as a corporation, specifically for purposes of suing and being sued, until it is actually dissolved. ... Oklahoma, the state of incorporation of the defendant in question (Subscription Plus), is one of those states. And, for icing on the cake, Oklahoma also has a statute making reinstatement of a corporation’s charter retroactive. We conclude that the revocation of Subscription Plus's corporate charter did not affect its status for diversity purposes.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “jurisdiction is normally determined as of the date of the filing of the suit”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.