Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 F.3d 560 - Robinson v. Hager

Robinson v. Hager’s Empirical Analysis

292 F.3d 560 · 2002

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
July 2024
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 10 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably Williams v. Conagra Poultry Co. (2004), Schaub v. VonWald (2011)

17 federal appellate · 10 district ·

270200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Relies on Estelle v. Gamble · Farmer v. Brennan · Robert Foulk v. Ronald Charrier · Glastetter v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. · Delores Turner v. Iowa Fire Equipment Company an Iowa Corporation Iowa Fire Equipment Company Third Party

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “is not within the realm of lay understanding.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “although a person suffering from a stroke may exhibit visible symptoms, the stroke itself is a sophisticated injury which could be caused by numerous factors other than lack of medication. Therefore, expert medical testimony is needed to prove causation.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “fatal to [her] deliberate indifference claim as a matter of law.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.