Ramirez v. Barnhart’s Empirical Analysis
292 F.3d 576 · 2002
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Relies on Polaski v. Heckler · Black v. Apfel · Chamberlain v. Shalala · William B. Johnson v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security · Pena v. Chater
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The adjudicator must give full consideration to all of the evidence presented relating to subjective complaints, including the claimant’s prior work record, and observations by third parties and treating and examining physicians relating to such matters as: 1) the claimant’s daily activities; 2) the duration, frequency and intensity of the pain; 3) precipitating and aggravating factors; 4) dosage, effectiveness and side effects of medication; 5) functional restrictions.”
8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(1) whether the claimant is gainfully employed, (2) whether the claimant has a severe impairment, (3) whether the impairment meets the criteria of any Social Security Income listings, (4) whether the impairment prevents the claimant from performing past relevant work, and (5) whether the impairment necessarily prevents the claimant from doing any other work.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Reed v. Astrue · Viers v. Astrue“all disability claimants are financially motivated to some extent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.