Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 292 F.3d 669 - Sistrunk v. Armenakis

Sistrunk v. Armenakis’s Empirical Analysis

292 F.3d 669 · 2002

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
April 2024
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently April 2024 · most notably Lee v. Lampert (2011), Griffin v. Johnson (2003)

11 federal appellate · 2 district ·

120200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 2253 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Schlup v. Delo · McCleskey v. Zant · Herrera v. Collins · Carriger v. Stewart · Karis v. Calderon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a petitioner must show that, in light of all the evidence, including evidence not presented at trial, `it is more likely than not that no reasonable juror would have found petitioner guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “a close review of the magistrate judge's order ... disclose[d] that the magistrate judge did, in fact, consider all of the evidence offered by Sistrunk.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Sistrunk's evidence [was] newly presented, and thus, may be considered in analyzing his Schlup claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.