PER CURIAM. ¶1 Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal and grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics , 403 U.S. 388 , 91 S.Ct. 1999 , 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Johnson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt , 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir.2004) (de novo standard of review for Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); Anderson v. Larson , 327 F.3d 762 , 767 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo standard of review for grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.
¶2 . The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the reports and recommenda-lions of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.
Download
Copy
Embed on your site
iframe Markdown Preview card Button Hover to preview · click to copy the code