Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

292 F. App'x 523

Johnson v. Florell

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided September 15, 2008

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2008-09-15

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Anderson v. Larson · Federer v. Gephardt

Decided 2008-09-15

PER CURIAM.

¶1Joseph Johnson appeals the district court’s1 dismissal and grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants in this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). Having carefully reviewed the record and considered Johnson’s arguments, we find no basis for reversal. See Federer v. Gephardt, 363 F.3d 754, 757 (8th Cir.2004) (de novo standard of review for Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) dismissal); Anderson v. Larson, 327 F.3d 762, 767 (8th Cir.2003) (de novo standard of review for grant of summary judgment). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶2. The Honorable Richard H. Kyle, United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota, adopting the reports and recommenda-lions of the Honorable Arthur J. Boylan, United States Magistrate Judge for the District of Minnesota.

/292/fappx/523 · .json · Public domain