Johnson v. Advanced Engineering & Planning Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 2410 · 41 U.S.C. § 605 · 41 U.S.C. § 609
Relies on Consolidated Edison Co of New York v. National Labor Relations Board · Reflectone, Inc. v. Dalton · James Ellett Construction Company Inc v. United States · Dawco Construction, Inc. v. United States · SMS Data Products Group, Inc. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“If a contractor incurred the cost for the genuine purpose of materially furthering the negotiation process, such cost should normally be a contract administration cost ____ On the other hand, if a contractor’s underlying purpose for incurring a cost is to promote the prosecution of a CDA claim against the government, then such cost is unallowable____”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.