Armstrong v. Navient Solutions, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1334 (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681A · 15 U.S.C. § 1681H · 15 U.S.C. § 1681S · 15 U.S.C. § 1681T · 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Class Action Fairness Act of 2005)
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an asserted injury to even a statutorily conferred right must actually exist”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.