Durham v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2012
Citation profile
56
cited by 56 later decisions
1
states following
October 2024
most recently cited
56 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Jackson v. Virginia · Crawford v. Washington · Nix v. Whiteside · State v. Kelly
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 56 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[i]n appeals of criminal cases, plain error review is currently limited to alleged error in three circumstances: the sentencing phase of a trial resulting in the death penalty, a trial judge’s expression of opinion in violation of OCGA § 17-8-57, and a jury charge affecting substantial rights of the parties as provided under OCGA § 17-8-58 (b). [Cit.]”
4 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Buckner v. State · Carter v. State“the error seriously affect[ed] the fairness, integrity or public reputation of the proceedings below.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“legitimate trial strategy that falls within the range of reasonable professional conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.