292 Ga. App. 129 - Hernandez v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Huff v. State · Sammons v. State · Hampton v. State · 230 Ga. App. 546 - Russell v. State · Brooks v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Thus, where a defendant is resentenced, or ... a sentence is amended, the defendant should be allowed to be present. That is because a resentencing proceeding is a critical stage in which a defendant's rights may be lost, privileges may be claimed or waived, or in which the outcome of the case can be substantially affected.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BARBER v. the STATE.“A criminal defendant has the right to be present at all critical stages of the proceedings against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. BARBER v. the STATE.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.